{"id":228,"date":"2002-10-10T23:27:31","date_gmt":"2002-10-10T23:27:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.net\/?p=228"},"modified":"2002-10-10T23:27:31","modified_gmt":"2002-10-10T23:27:31","slug":"after-the-next-generation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=228","title":{"rendered":"After the Next Generation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.trektoday.com\/news\/101002_02.shtml\">TrekToday<\/a> reports on an interview Brent Spiner gave where he says that Paramount considered making <b>Star Trek X<\/b> without the <b>Next Generation<\/b> characters:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe studio, I think, wasn&#8217;t really crazy about doing another movie with the <b>Next Generation<\/b> crew.  What I think they wanted to do was a movie with a new <i>Star Trek<\/i> cast. Rick said he didn&#8217;t think that that was a good idea, and he didn&#8217;t think that it would work. He told them, believe it or not, that the audience still enjoys seeing us.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\nFrankly, I&#8217;d rather see a <i>Trek<\/i> film that <i>didn&#8217;t<\/i> focus heavily on Picard and Data, as the last three have.  Who cares about Picard and his angst?  Who cares about Data and his &#8220;witless exploration of humanity,&#8221; to use Q&#8217;s snide phrase?  Not I.  And doubtless millions of others feel the same way.<\/p>\n<p>I have no objection to seeing a <b>Next Generation<\/b> film.  I just want to see the film break some new ground with the characters and take them places they&#8217;ve never been before&#8211;both physically and psychologically.  Characters like Riker and Troi have been strictly background for the past three films.  Crusher and Geordi haven&#8217;t had anything significant to do, either.  On the one hand there&#8217;s the time limitation&#8211;a two-hour film can only encompass so much, and with seven characters off the bat with some amount of screen time there&#8217;s only so many ways to share the time and screen.  On the other hand, each character received a good deal of attention when the series was on the air, and do we really <i>need<\/i> to focus on the characters yet again?<\/p>\n<p>Is that the right approach?  Forsake character and make a <b>Next Generation<\/b> film that&#8217;s balls-to-the-walls action?  Perhaps not.<\/p>\n<p>The trouble with the <i>Trek<\/i> films has been, I think, the fact there <i>are<\/i> so many characters to fit into the picture.  Rather than one or two protagonists, there&#8217;s seven or eight.  And each of the protagonists has their cadre of fans who wants to see their favorite character say and do something significant.  In a way I think that&#8217;s counterproductive; if Crusher doesn&#8217;t have anything to contribute to the film, why include her?  If Troi isn&#8217;t going to spout pointless psychobabble, why waste lines on the character?  But Paramount probably doesn&#8217;t want to alienate the devoted fans of Doctor Crusher, and perhaps many other fans would feel that they&#8217;re being cheated out of seeing the <i>ensemble<\/i> together again for the umpteenth time.  In <b>Star Trek II<\/b> did Sulu really <i>need<\/i> to be the one at helm, or couldn&#8217;t a low-paid extra have done the job?  In <b>Insurrection<\/b> did Troi and Crusher really do <i>anything<\/i> of import?  Scotty?  Uhura?  These are characters that have their fans, but they don&#8217;t contribute in the film&#8217;s final calculus.  Fans want to see them for nostalgia&#8217;s sake, but they&#8217;re useless for drama&#8217;s sake.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe it is time to rethink the <i>Trek<\/i> film franchise as something separate from the television franchise.  The current run of films are essentially extensions of the seven seasons of <b>Next Generation<\/b>.  Nothing in the last three films couldn&#8217;t have been done of television.  Maybe not as well or as polished because of budget concerns, but they could have been done.  And I think it&#8217;s for this very reason that the <i>Star Trek<\/i> films aren&#8217;t blockbusters&#8211;because the audience can see <b>Next Generation<\/b> on television for <i>free<\/i>, so why go and pay for it if it&#8217;s not going to be anything different?<\/p>\n<p>A <i>Star Trek<\/i> film with a new cast brings with it a whole set of advantages.<\/p>\n<p>First, with a whole new cast it&#8217;s not something the audience will see on television.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the story doesn&#8217;t have to tie itself to the other shows and thus limit its storytelling options.<\/p>\n<p>Third, the film is going to have a much lower budget with a group of relative unknowns, and the only characters that need in-depth casting are the ones that actually affect the outcome of the story.<\/p>\n<p>Harve Bennett&#8217;s <i>Starfleet Academy<\/i> script would be ideal.  Or perhaps a Captain Pike film.  Or perhaps something completely unrelated to anything we&#8217;ve seen on television.  Remove the shackles the the television series have put on the franchise and <i>Star Trek<\/i> can go <i>anywhere<\/i>.  The time is well overdue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TrekToday reports on an interview Brent Spiner gave where he says that Paramount considered making Star Trek X without the Next Generation characters: The studio, I think, wasn&#8217;t really crazy about doing another movie with the Next Generation crew. What I think they wanted to do was a movie with a new Star Trek cast.<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=228\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;After the Next Generation&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[199],"class_list":["post-228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-star-trek","tag-star-trek-the-next-generation","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}