{"id":2424,"date":"2009-11-16T22:05:52","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T03:05:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.net\/?p=2424"},"modified":"2009-11-16T22:05:52","modified_gmt":"2009-11-17T03:05:52","slug":"on-the-waters-of-mars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=2424","title":{"rendered":"On &#8220;The Waters of Mars&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;ve watched last night&#8217;s <i>Doctor Who<\/i>, &#8220;The Waters of Mars.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s slickly made.  The effects work was especially nice.  Graeme Harper acquitted himself well behind the camera.  I loved the mention of the Ice Warriors.<\/p>\n<p>I thought it was incredibly boring.<\/p>\n<p>The plot is rather linear.  The Doctor arrives at Bowie Base One on Mars (and yes, Virginia, there <i>is<\/i> life on Mars), has a geek moment, and then announces that he needs to bugger off.  The twist, for once, is that the Doctor doesn&#8217;t want to get involved.  And it&#8217;s not like events <i>force<\/i> him to get involved; they actually <i>don&#8217;t<\/i>.  He really <i>is<\/i> allowed to bugger off, once it&#8217;s clear the situation is generally under control and he can&#8217;t do anything.  But then the Doctor has an attack of conscience, goes a bit mental, resolves the situation, saves the people, and announces that he can do whatever he wants.  Then bad things happen.  The Doctor buggers off in the TARDIS.  The end.<\/p>\n<p>The problem with the episode is that it <i>wants<\/i> you to think that it&#8217;s playing with some interesting ideas, when it really isn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s trying to look more important than it is.  There <i>should<\/i> be a massive philosophical exploration of destiny and fate versus free-will.  The questions that the eighth Doctor and Badar wrestled with over when the Doctor can interfere with history and when he can&#8217;t in Lawrence Miles&#8217; <i>Interference<\/i> are absolutely relevent to this story.  Why can the Doctor topple this government, but why can&#8217;t the Doctor save that life?  &#8220;The Waters of Mars&#8221; <i>hints<\/i> at that &mdash; yes, the Doctor says he <i>can&#8217;t<\/i> get involved &mdash; but there&#8217;s no depth to it.  It&#8217;s so&#8230; because the Doctor says it&#8217;s so.<\/p>\n<p>No one would try to discern a coherent philosophical system from <i>Doctor Who<\/i>, though <i>Doctor Who and Philosophy<\/i> is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opencourtbooks.com\/categories\/pcp.htm\">forthcoming from Open Court Press in 2010<\/a>, and there&#8217;s a website called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.doctorwhoandphilosophy.com\/\"><i>Doctor Who<\/i> and Philosophy<\/a> (which has a not unattractive design) and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/pages\/Doctor-Who-and-Philosophy\/117951048351\">a Facebook page<\/a>, too.  So, okay, okay, people <i>are<\/i> trying to discern coherent philosophical systems from <i>Doctor Who<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>The point that I&#8217;m trying to make, since I went off on that tangent about <i>Doctor Who<\/i> and philosophy, but not <i>Doctor Who<\/i> and LEGO, is that there&#8217;s a <i>big<\/i> idea that <i>should<\/i> be at the heart of the episode &mdash; when can the Doctor get involved, and what <i>limits<\/i> his involvement &mdash; except that it&#8217;s handled poorly and off-handedly.  It <i>should<\/i> have been the dramatic engine of the episode.  Instead, kids at home were probably wondering why the Doctor wasn&#8217;t trying to save everyone.  Just saying &#8220;I can&#8217;t be here&#8221; isn&#8217;t enough.  Just saying &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry&#8221; isn&#8217;t enough.<\/p>\n<p>RTD sometimes let the spectacle get in the way of the ideas.  There <i>were<\/i> ideas, but they came too late, and the groundwork for the change in the Doctor&#8217;s personna from geek to god wasn&#8217;t established well enough before it happened.  In this episode, anyway.  One could argue that this &mdash; the monster in geek&#8217;s clothing &mdash; has <i>always<\/i> been a part of the tenth Doctor&#8217;s characterization, from his toppling of Harriet Jones&#8217; government to his genocide against the Racnoss to his cruelty toward the Family of Blood.<\/p>\n<p>I was bored with &#8220;The Waters of Mars.&#8221;  I wasn&#8217;t engaged by it.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, I&#8217;m still looking forward to Christmas and the regeneration.  It&#8217;s the event that RTD has been building toward, as should be fairly clear by now, for his entire tenure as <i>Doctor Who<\/i>&#8216;s producer.  I like novelist Jon Blum&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/jblum.livejournal.com\/193104.html\">ideas on where this may go<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I think RTD has been heading for a Reset Button, and I&#8217;ve thought this as far back as the third season.  RTD is passing on the box of <i>Doctor Who<\/i> toys, and there&#8217;s one toy that he took out of the box and hasn&#8217;t used &mdash; Gallifrey and the Time Lords.  It&#8217;s not RTD&#8217;s toy to take out of the box permanently, though; it was in the box when RTD received the box of toys from Philip Segal, and it was in the box of toys when Segal received them from John Nathan-Turner.  For Steven Moffat to have the same box of toys to play with that <i>he<\/i> had, RTD has to put the Gallifrey\/Time Lord toy back into the box.  Maybe it will be overt, maybe it will be subtle (like <i>The Gallifrey Chronicles<\/i>, come to think of it), but the toy will go back in, and Moffat will inherit a toy box with all its toys intact. :tardis:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;ve watched last night&#8217;s Doctor Who, &#8220;The Waters of Mars.&#8221; It&#8217;s slickly made. The effects work was especially nice. Graeme Harper acquitted himself well behind the camera. I loved the mention of the Ice Warriors. I thought it was incredibly boring. The plot is rather linear. The Doctor arrives at Bowie Base One on<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=2424\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;On &#8220;The Waters of Mars&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[4082,4122,723,281],"class_list":["post-2424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doctor-who","tag-doctor-who","tag-mars","tag-russell-t-davies","tag-tenth-doctor","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}