{"id":28633,"date":"2014-07-31T01:17:13","date_gmt":"2014-07-31T01:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=28633"},"modified":"2014-07-31T01:17:13","modified_gmt":"2014-07-31T01:17:13","slug":"fundraising-and-john-boehners-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=28633","title":{"rendered":"Fundraising and John Boehner&#8217;s Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Today I have received more political fundraising e-mails than I can count.  And, with one exception, they&#8217;ve all centered on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/thetwo-way\/2014\/07\/30\/336670807\/house-votes-to-ok-lawsuit-against-obama\">the House GOP&#8217;s vote to sue President Obama<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><i>The Atlantic<\/i> had a piece up today about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2014\/07\/21-emails-from-the-democratic-party-about-impeachment\/375244\/\">the 21 fundraising emails the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee<\/a> sent out over the weekend about the lawsuit and its potential for impeachment.<\/p>\n<p>I received all of those e-mails.  I wasn&#8217;t happy about receiving them.  The first few were fine, but then they became excessively cloying.  Pleading and begging.  Overly familiar.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to take a look at two I&#8217;ve received today.  The first one I&#8217;m going to look at is the most recent one.  It&#8217;s ostensibly from Nancy Pelosi.  Subject line: &#8220;new low (Boehner)&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This is a new low.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans just went on the House floor and voted to authorize Boehner\u2019s lawsuit against President Obama.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is: House Republicans are using this lawsuit to slander the President. Boehner\u2019s House Republicans accused President Obama of some pretty nasty things tonight.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re claiming he\u2019s breaking the law.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re claiming he\u2019s deliberately exceeding his constitutional authority.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re EVEN claiming he\u2019s acting against the wishes of the Founding Fathers.<\/p>\n<p><b>I\u2019m sick of the slanderous accusations against President Obama. I\u2019m tired of Boehner using taxpayer dollars to fund his vendetta against President Obama. We need to fight back.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I would quibble with one or two things here.  The &#8220;acting against the wishes of the Founding Fathers&#8221; is new to me; I&#8217;ve not heard that one before.  &#8220;Slander[ing] the President,&#8221; though, isn&#8217;t anything new; they&#8217;ve accused Obama of everything, from having a fake birth certificate and being a non-citizen to being a secret Muslim.  The GOP and their talking heads have thrown crud at President Obama for six years.  This is nothing new.<\/p>\n<p>The e-mail from Sara Alexander, the RNC&#8217;s Chief Operating Officer, is a little different, as you might expect.  Subject line: &#8220;IT PASSED: House Republicans are suing Obama&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Moments ago, the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation allowing House Republicans to sue President Obama for his unconstitutional executive overreach.<\/p>\n<p>This is a HUGE STEP in stopping President Obama.<\/p>\n<p>Speaker Boehner and House Republicans are suing this Imperial President for expanding his power and control beyond the constitutional and legal limits.<\/p>\n<p>President Obama has failed to uphold the crux of his constitutional duty \u2013 to \u201ctake care that the laws be faithfully executed\u201d \u2013 and he must be held accountable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sara, I have a very important question for you.  Please think carefully before you answer it.<\/p>\n<p>Define &#8220;held accountable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s suppose, for a moment, that the House GOP&#8217;s lawsuit prevails in court.  There are reasons to think that it won&#8217;t &mdash; standing is a big issue and has a good chance of kicking the lawsuit entirely &mdash; but let&#8217;s suppose that it does.<\/p>\n<p>What sanctions do you expect?  And, how do expect those sanctions to be enforced?<\/p>\n<p>There was a lawsuit over Indian rights during Andrew Jackson&#8217;s presidency.  Jackson, as the Trail of Tears would suggest, was not particularly interested in the Native American population.  The case reached the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Marshall handed down a decision Jackson didn&#8217;t care for, and Jackson&#8217;s response was, &#8220;John Marshall has rendered his decision, now let him enforce it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If the House prevails at some point in the next two and a half years, we would have the same situation.  Boehner would have his decision; how would he enforce it?<\/p>\n<p>If the House GOP really and truly believes that the president is a tyrant who is operating outside Constitutional norms, a lawsuit is not the remedy.  The Constitution is clear &mdash; impeachment is the remedy for high crimes and misdemeanors.  And, as we found out in 1973 and 1998, &#8220;high crimes and misdemeanors&#8221; mean whatever a majority of the House of Representatives say they mean.<\/p>\n<p>There are good and sound reasons why the GOP is playing down the impeachment talk they&#8217;ve encouraged the last six years and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2014\/07\/30\/the-gop-s-audacious-impeachment-spin-job.html\">blame-shifting it over to the Democrats<\/a>; even if the GOP takes the Senate in November, the GOP would <b>never<\/b> get 67 votes in the Senate for conviction and removal.<\/p>\n<p>But impeachment would not be as transparent a stunt as this lawsuit.  The lawsuit is all about giving the appearance to the base of doing something to stand up to Obama without <i>actually<\/i> anything productive, not unlike the patented Marvel Comics&#8217; &#8220;appearance of change&#8221; where major characters go through major, traumatic events and\/or changes, only to have them revert back to the iconic status quo within two years.  Comic book fans, at least, are aware enough of the cynicism to see through it; the politicians and the media that enable them, though, treat the cynicism as though it&#8217;s deathly serious.<\/p>\n<p>The GOP is making a stupid move.  The Democrats don&#8217;t need to do <i>anything<\/i>; when your opponent is making a stupid move and beating himself up, <i>don&#8217;t stop him<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>I gave neither the DCCC nor the RNC money.  This reason &mdash; the lawsuit and potential impeachment &mdash; don&#8217;t warrant it for the Democrats.  And for the Republicans?  I&#8217;d like to see them stand for <i>something<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and as I wrote this, I got an e-mail purportedly from Joe Biden.  He&#8217;s right when he writes: &#8220;It&#8217;s unlike anything I&#8217;ve ever seen. And you know what, Allyn? I can guarantee you that these guys are not done attacking this President.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Still not a reason to give money.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today I have received more political fundraising e-mails than I can count. And, with one exception, they&#8217;ve all centered on the House GOP&#8217;s vote to sue President Obama. The Atlantic had a piece up today about the 21 fundraising emails the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out over the weekend about the lawsuit and its<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/?p=28633\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Fundraising and John Boehner&#8217;s Lawsuit&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[119],"tags":[206,618,343,172,120],"class_list":["post-28633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-barack-obama","tag-democratic-party","tag-impeachment","tag-john-boehner","tag-republican-party","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28633\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/28499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.allyngibson.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}